Instrumenting a flight-test campaign without losing a single measurement

Hundreds of sensors, avionics buses, video and a telemetry link, all on one time base, in an aircraft that was never designed for any of it. Here is the problem as we see it, and what we have brought to it since 1979.

scroll

ONBOARD Sensor Conditioning Converter Multiplexing Time stamping Writing telemetry, live medium, after the flight ON THE GROUND RF reception & decommutation Download Replay & calibration Analysis & export Report One time reference runs through the whole chain. Everything else depends on it.
The chain from sensor to report. Every stage shown here is one decision, and the decisions are coupled.
Acquisition
up to 1 Gbit/s
Formats
IRIG 106 Ch. 10 · D.T.MUX
Time base
PTP · IRIG-B · GPS
Qualification
DO-160G · MIL-STD-810

THE PROBLEM

Four budgets that have to close at the same time

A campaign is not sized by the number of channels. It is sized by four budgets that pull on each other: bit rate, storage, telemetry link and installation. Miss one and the others shift under your feet.

The link decides before the first flight

The telemetry link will never carry everything the recorder captures. What goes down live, what stays on board and what margin is kept are choices to make on paper, with the ground team, before anything is bolted in.

One time base for everything

Analog channels, MIL-STD-1553 and ARINC 429 traffic, video and the ground station must share one clock. Without it, correlating an event across sources becomes guesswork, and the campaign report inherits the doubt.

The installation costs more than the equipment

Cable mass, bay space, power and the qualification of the installation itself usually outweigh the boxes. Electronics that are compact, modular and already qualified change the size of the whole job.

THE ANSWER

What ETEP brings

A chain designed as one system rather than assembled from parts, by people who have spent four decades on flight lines.

The complete chain from one supplier

Acquisition and recording on board with NanoX, NanoS2 or COD-R, transmission with TX-MOD, reception with the Ground Station, replay with D.T.MUX Viewer. One format policy, one point of contact when something has to change on a Friday.

Modular, and distributable when the airframe demands it

Stackable modules, ultra-miniature units next to the sensors, rugged PTP switches to hold the network together. The architecture follows the aircraft, not the other way round.

Two formats, one decision

IRIG 106 Chapter 10 for interoperability with your existing tools, the D.T.MUX format for robustness on the recorder. Lossless conversion either way, so the choice never locks you in.

Qualified before it arrives

DO-160G and MIL-STD-810 evidence available for the installation file, so the equipment is not the item that delays acceptance.

FREQUENTLY ASKED

What we get asked first

How many channels can one system take?

From a handful on a COD-R to several hundred on a NanoX with its module set, and the units combine on the same network. The right question is the bit rate they produce together: that is what sizes the recorder and, above all, the telemetry link. Our sizing article walks through the calculation.

IRIG 106 Chapter 10 or the D.T.MUX format?

Both are recorded natively. Chapter 10 keeps you compatible with third-party analysis tools; the D.T.MUX format is built to survive interrupted recordings. D.T.MUX Converter translates between them without loss, so the decision follows your toolchain, not ours.

How quickly can an aircraft be equipped?

It depends on the configuration and on the installation approval more than on the hardware. The online configurators give a realistic starting point in ten minutes; from there we work with your integration team on the schedule.

Tell us about your campaign

A parameter list, an aircraft type and a date are enough to start. Our engineers reply, not a sales script.

Talk to an engineer  →